Child pages
  • Comparison of Jira, Jira Agile, Rapid Boards and paper-based task boards
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Comparison table

Criteria

JIRA

JIRA Agile

Rapid Boards

JIRA Wallboard

Paper-based Task Boards

Quick overview

least (Fehler)

okay (Haken)

high (Plus)

very high (Daumen hoch)

very high (Daumen hoch)

Accompanies daily standup

least (Fehler)

a little (Haken)

good (Plus)

good (Plus)

perfect (Daumen hoch)

Transparency

least (Fehler)

good (Haken)

high (Plus)

very high (Daumen hoch)

very high (Daumen hoch)

Accuracy

very high (Daumen hoch)

good (Haken)

good (Haken)

no changes (Minus)

rough / status (Haken)

Team identification

least (Fehler)

limited (Fehler)

okay (Plus)

limited (Fehler)

very high (Daumen hoch)

Completeness

very high (Daumen hoch)

okay (Haken)

least (Fehler)

incomplete (Fehler)

incomplete (Fehler)

Speed

least (Fehler)

okay (Haken)

high (Plus)

no changes (Minus)

very high (Daumen hoch)

Distributed teams

good (Haken)

good (Haken)

good (Haken)

okay (Haken)

only on-site (Fehler)

Mobility

good (Haken)

good (Haken)

good (Haken)

okay (Haken)

only on-site (Fehler)

Visual markers & Avatars

limited (Fehler)

least (Fehler)

okay (Plus)

limited (Fehler)

very easy (Daumen hoch)

Creativity / Flexibility

least (Fehler)

limited (Fehler)

okay (Plus)

limited (Fehler)

very high (Daumen hoch)

Impressions from //SEIBERT/MEDIA paper-based taskboards

Comparison